![]() ![]() This means the vehicle’s restraint systems did a really good job of limiting forces to the rear occupant in the 40-mph frontal crash, while also keeping the occupant from coming too close to interior vehicle surfaces that could pose injury risk." The Mustang Mach-E was the only model in this group of 13 midsize SUVs to receive no downgrades in any of the ratings categories. Joe Young, spokesman for IIHS, told the Detroit Free Press, "We’re really encouraged by the performance of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Explorer. More: Ford cuts Mach-E price to compete with Tesla, offers deal to recent buyers too Researchers used video footage and greasepaint on the dummy’s head to confirm restraints prevented the head from hitting the vehicle interior or coming too close to the front seatback and also prevented the dummy’s body from “submarining,” or sliding forward beneath the lap belt, which causes abdominal injuries, the release said.Ī pressure sensor helped gauge the risk of chest injuries. ![]() To earn a good rating, measurements recorded by sensors in the second-row dummy could not exceed limits that would indicate excessive risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, abdomen or thigh, the news release said. This latest study was launched to spotlight back seat safety systems, which have more slowly adopted seat belt and seat design updates.Ī crash-test dummy representing a 12-year-old child was seated in the second row behind the driver. "In the Grand Cherokee, the rear dummy’s head ended up between the window and the air bag as it rebounded from the initial impact, increasing the risk of injury from the hard surfaces of the vehicle interior or objects outside the vehicle," the study said. The remaining nine SUVs earned back seat passenger safety ratings that reflect various levels of risk for chest, abdominal, head or neck injury: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |